Saturday, February 13, 2016

CRISPR: The Medicine of the Future


The scientific world is reaching new frontiers with the recent developments of the CRISPR/CAS9 mechanism.  CRISPR (pronounced crisper) is a new genomic editing tool which allows scientist to integrate or delete specific sequences in the human genome. In layman’s terms, scientist can control physical traits in humans. That’s right—you can now choose to add on all the physical traits idolized by society. The whole idea of picking and choosing traits sounds amazing, but let’s be serious here—is this really what scientist sought out to do? In the medical world, CRISPR plays a huge role in disease prevention and therapy. The mechanism is probably the answer to almost any health disease you can think of (HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer, Huntington, etc.).  So why aren’t we using this technology yet? Because as beneficial as it may sound, CRISPR also harbors the elements needed to do some serious damage. The truth is—the world is not ready to fully utilize CRISPR yet.
"Evolution has been working toward optimizing the human genome for 3.85 billion years. Do we really think that some small group of human genome tinkerers could do better without all sorts of unintended consequences (Collins)?"
CRISPR is a definitely a great medical tool, but is it an ethical one? Editing the germ line of an individual will make changes in all future generation off springs, every one of which, can not give consent. Before CRISPR can be fully utilized we must make sure that if any changes are made to a human embryo, those changes are beneficial for the overall survival of the individual, and the overall population. These changes must be made carefully, taking into account all possible negative outcomes of the specific genomic changes. However, Scientist believe that we can not predict future outcomes, and that we do not understand the true consequences of deleting or inserting desirable traits.
"Changing the DNA in reproductive cells changes not only the resulting individual but all of that individual’s descendants, essentially allowing humans to direct their own evolution. There’s deep concern that we’re not smart enough, let alone wise enough, to do that, as Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, told STAT this month. If time-traveling scientists had edited out the gene for sickle cell disease a few thousand years ago, for instance, humankind might have been wiped out by malaria; the sickle cell gene protects against that disease (STAT News)."
            Another problems scientist face is the fact that the current CRISPR mechanism is not perfect. It sometime introduces random mutations at off target sites. This means that the CRISPR mechanism may miss the trait it aims for, and introduce an unanticipated health problem in the individual. A bioengineering professor, Gang Bao states, “Even if on-target gene editing is accurate, the off-target effects could influence the function of many genes, possibly posing serious health problems. In the germ line, off-target effects might persist for generations and could lead to long-term changes in the genome” (STAT News)
            CRISPR is available for anyone to get their hands on. If you happen to work in a lab, and you would like to experiment with CRISPR, then you can! This leads to another controversial issue. What if CRISPR falls into the wrong hands? Someone can literally turn this tool into the ideal  weapon for bio warfare. This is a huge disaster just waiting to happen. The use of CRISPR should be highly regulated, to ensure the safety of the population. This is just another step we need to take before CRISPR can truly be safe. 
            It is clear that the CRISPR method still needs to keep on its training wheels. We are not yet at a point where we can utilize this piece of biotechnology, without uncontrollably causing harm to potential patients. For the most part, I believe this tool should only be used on patients who critically need its benefits. There are many people dying of disease everyday and even passing these diseases on to their off springs, with CRISPR, this will no longer be a problem.  Changing someone’s DNA sequence to introduce better physical traits is unnecessary at this current point in time. It is important that scientist continue to work on ways to enhance the disease preventative efficiency of CRISPR in the hopes that it will one day save the lives of many people. Finally, we must also make sure that the use of CRISPR is highly regulated to prevent the technology from falling into the wrong hands.
 

4 comments:

Ary Mad said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Crispr sounds like an amazing feat. Being able to change human genetics to whatever suits the needs of the individual seems like a scary concept. If this type of technology is allowed to become commonplace, we could potentially make whatever we want. We could be free from disease, 7 feet tall, black, white, super smart the possibilities are endless. With this type of technology, we face an enormous amount of ethical decisions and it is most probable that this type of thing will only be available for the extremely rich. If it is a technology that only the rich can use, then only the top 1% will benefit from this will only add to the social stratification that our society now faces. This type of technology should be tested and used with extreme caution and much thought should be given to this matter before proceeding with this type of technology.

Jason said...

This is fascinating stuff. I am not too familiar with the field of genetic engineering, and your article is the first time I am hearing about CRISPR. Even though we lack the technology to fully utilize it yet, it still shows that how far we have come as a race.

That being said, this still raises several questions. I think the one of the most significant one is whether this technology is ethical. Yes, using it to treat diseases that are now incurable is definitely a positive action, but this will probably be used to genetically engineer people to have traits that are idolized by society, such as being tall, muscular, athletic, fair-skinned, smart, and so on. In this case, we eliminate diversity and uniqueness in order to adhere to an arbitrary image that has been deemed “ideal.” And what if this technology comes at an exorbitant cost, and only people with enough means are able to access it? People who cannot afford CRISPR will be ostracized from society because they look drastically different from and function worse than the genetically engineered ones. Moreover, children of people who could not afford CRISPR will be born with the potential to have all the incurable diseases, lowering their life expectancy. The introduction of CRISPR without being able to commercialize it at a reasonable cost would widen the gap between the poor and the rich even more.

CRISPR reminds me of the movie Gattaca. In this film, with a technology similar to CRISPR, people are able to be genetically engineered. Parents with more money assign better qualities and traits to their children than those who have less money than them. Therefore, even among the “qualified” people (called “valids” in the movie) a significant gap exists, not to mention between the “valids” and “in-valids.” The society adopts a caste system, and people without certain genetic score cannot even apply for certain jobs. Even though this is a movie and might have been overly exaggerated in certain aspects, I fear that something similar might become reality. Colleges and companies might asking for your genetic score when you apply for them. They might mask it as needing the score for statistical reasons (like they do it with race today), but everyone will know that the score is one of the most crucial aspects in getting accepted.

Joub In said...

This was a very interesting read! I had no idea that we were so close to being able to manipulate the human genome. It sounds a lot like CRISPR may really be the next big thing to hit the biotechnology world. I also agree that there are many ethical dilemmas we have to think about before we can really utilize the benefits that this technology gives us. It was also interesting to read about how the method is not 100% safe, and how small errors could be hazardous. Before we release CRISPR to the public we would need to ensure that it does not cause any adverse medical side effects. I also agree that we really need to worry about who can get their hands on the technology, because it seems like CRISPR can be used as biological weapon. CRISPR will be very beneficial when it comes to targeting and correcting diseases, but I wonder where we will draw the line. To me it sounds a lot like the future of plastic surgery, a new tool that gives us the ability to not only modify physical traits, but genetic traits as well.